Welcome!, to ask a question please log in or register...
Search this site:
Posted: October 5, 2008 | Permalink| Comments (3)

So, you’ve decided you have enough time to sit through all the ups and downs of the stock market and hope that handsome returns will reward your patience. I bet you’re getting plenty of contradictory advice from other share investors, who seem to be divided into two main camps: the index-trackers versus the believers in active equity management.

What is the difference?

With index-tracking you buy all the shares in the index in the same weightings as that index. If you track the FTSE/JSE All Share Index, for example, your index-tracking fund will invest in all the shares listed on the JSE and if Anglo American makes up 20% of the JSE, your fund will allocate 20% of its capital to Anglo American. In other words, index-tracking funds just replicate an index and their managers don’t have to decide which shares offer value for money. They are therefore also called passive managers.

Active managers, on the other hand, seldom buy all shares in the index and if they think Anglo American is too expensive relative to its anticipated future earnings, they may decide to invest only 5% of the fund in this share, for example. Conversely, if they think a share is cheap, they may buy more of it than its percentage weighting in the index. They have the freedom to actively pick shares in quantities that they think suit the shares’ value-for-money ratings.

To choose active management, what do you have to believe?

1. Shares are not perfectly priced all the time

Active management only makes sense if you believe that the market does not price companies correctly over the short term, which offers opportunities to buy under-priced shares.

2. Managers who consistently out-perform the market exist

Sobering slide 5 in the latest Nedgroup Investments September 2008 Partnerships Roadshow presentation shows that over the past seven years, the average equity unit trust manager returned 22% after fees – the same as the JSE All Share Index. Active management seems less futile when you think that, if about half the managers under-performed, half of them had to out-perform the Index. In other words, out-performing managers exist, but are they consistent?

I don’t expect a fund manager to out-perform every year. In fact, studies show that for a fund manager to out-perform over the long term, he often has to take contrarian views, which could frequently make him one of the worst performers over the short term. Your typical active manager expects the value of his chosen shares to unlock after three to five years only. With ‘consistent out-performance’ I therefore mean out-performance on a rolling 5-year basis.

3. You know who the out-performers will be

You should be able to get hold of the names of the rare few managers who have consistently out-performed on a rolling 5-year basis over the past 20 years. But that is historic performance. Do you believe that they will continue to out-perform?

4. The out-performance will out-weigh the higher costs

When you compare past performance, remember to look at the return after all fees and fund expenses were deducted. Generally, active managers are more expensive than index-trackers due to the time that they spend on researching and valuing companies.

When you choose passive management, what are you settling for?

1. Average stock market performance

While there’s little risk of investing in the worst-performing equity fund, you have no opportunity to out-perform the stock market either.

2. No way to detect and avoid market hype

It is a mistake to think that index investing is less volatile than active investing. When the stock market or one specific sector (e.g. IT) moves into ‘bubble’ territory, you automatically buy those over-priced stocks as part of the index. And experience the subsequent price correction.

How do you access active management?

1. Unit trusts

There are almost as many actively managed unit trusts as there are shares listed on our JSE. You can familiarise yourself with the managers by reading about their process and philosophy and studying their fund fact sheets. Equinox provides an on-line list of most South African unit trust portfolios.

2. Your employer’s fund

Maybe your employer’s pension or provident fund offers member choice. In other words the fund trustees allow you to pick the underlying portfolio from a shortlist. I would expect at least one of the options to be an actively managed fund, but its equity exposure will probably be limited to 75%.

3. A retirement annuity

Many modern, flexible retirement annuities allow you to choose your own underlying investment portfolio and an actively managed fund should be one of the options. As far as I know, Allan Gray is currently the only company that allows you to choose a 100% equity portfolio if you invest in their retirement annuity.

4. Your own share trading account

If you have the time and skill to analyse companies yourself, you could also build your own equity portfolio with an online share trading account. Just keep in mind that the tax treatment of trading profit is not always as favourable as with a unit trust portfolio or retirement annuity.

How do you access passive management?

1. Satrix

Satrix has created exchange traded funds (EFTs) which invest in the main South African equity indices. The Satrix 40 fund has a total expense ratio of 0.37% – a good selling point. But if you invest through the Satrix investment plan, the annual administration fee is 1.0% of the market value of your investment! In addition, your brokerage fee on any purchase or sale is 0.1% per transaction. For large investment amounts, it may be cheaper to use a stock broker rather than the Satrix plan. Also, your dividends don’t automatically get re-invested when you invest in the Satrix 40, but are paid to you after costs. This means your capital grows slower than if dividends were re-invested.

2. Unit trusts

There are a few unit trust portfolios that track the JSE All Share or the ALSI 40. Currently, Gryphon’s All Share Tracker Fund seems to offer index-tracking at the lowest cost: a total expense ratio of 0.69% and no initial fees.

3. Your employer’s fund

If your employer’s retirement fund offers member choice, I’d expect them to also offer a low-cost index-tracking option as one of the options.

undertip1.gif

In the next post we’ll have a look at the new investment methodology that tries to keep over-priced stocks out of your portfolio: fundamental or risk-adjusted indexation.

undertip1.gif


Filed under: Money matters — admin @ 4:49 pm
Posted: September 29, 2008 | Permalink| Comments (2)

You’ve decided which asset class and investment product suit you. It’s time for your last main investment decision.

Which product house?

The product provider could be a life assurer, a unit trust management company or a linked investment service provider (LISP). When choosing product providers, look for companies that are:

1. Focused on small, retail clients

Many companies claim that you, the retail investor, are important to them. In reality, they prefer to take your money through intermediaries like financial advisers or retirement fund trustees, rather than dealing directly with you. Signs that they are not really that interested in direct clients include:

  • Very little investor education literature
  • A poorly staffed call centre and irritable staff
  • A website that provides very little practical information on the investment process
  • No clear communication, a.k.a. simplified English policy
  • An almost immediate referral to a financial adviser when you contact them
Most companies seem to still believe that dealing with direct clients is too time-intensive and expensive. A rare few know how to leverage modern technology to cost-effectively service even the smallest retail investor well.

2. Fit and proper

With unit trusts, it’s highly unlikely that your money can just disappear. The Financial Services Board approved the independent trustees who look after the money in the trust. Still, it’s always important to verify that the company you want to invest with, is fit and proper. I usually check that they at least have a licence with the Financial Services Board and read on HelloPeter what existing clients are saying about them.

3. Flexible

I choose companies that, irrespective of the investment product I choose, provide me with ‘open architecture’ to build my own underlying investment portfolio. If I, for example buy a retirement annuity, I want access to any one or a combination of unit trusts available in South Africa as the portfolio in which my portion of the retirement annuity fund will invest. Just be careful, if the product provider has an in-house investment manager, you may pay extra (in the form of an administration fee) if you prefer a third-party investment manager.

4. Transparent

Ideally, you want to be able to see a list of all the underlying assets in which your investment product invests, as well as all the expenses associated with the product. It’s very difficult to know exactly how much of your investment portfolio is paid away as expenses and administration costs if you invest in opaque old-fashioned policies. But if you choose an open architecture product, you can track the total expense ratio (TER) of your chosen underlying unit trust portfolio.

5. Affordable

With unit trust portfolios, the total expense ratio (TER) is a ratio expressing the investment management fees, audit fees, custodian fees, portfolio bank charges and taxes as a percentage of the market value of the portfolio. (These costs decrease the return on your investment.) The ratio changes every quarter and is based on the previous year’s expenses. The TER does not have to include the portfolio’s stock broking fees and these can be quite high if the investment manager trades often. Some companies, like Allan Gray, decided to include brokerage in their TER calculations to give the investor a better idea of the true costs associated with running the unit trust. This makes it more difficult to compare the cost of different unit trusts using their TERs, but generally unusually high historic TERs require further investigation.

The TER does not include all costs carried by the investor. You could also be paying a fee to a life assurer for providing the wrapper of your investment. Or an administration fee to a LISP for acting as an agent in the investment process. And if a financial adviser helped you with your application process, you could also be paying initial and ongoing adviser fees (also called ‘broker fees’). The adviser has to disclose these costs and you will have to sign on the form that those are the fees that you have negotiated.

The life insurance industry uses another ratio, the reduction in yield (RIY), to indicate the annual impact of expenses on your investment. Unfortunately, this is not comparable with the unit trust industry’s TER. It’s a good idea to always ask for a complete cost breakdown for all products that you are considering. In the case of open architecture products, also enquire whether the underlying portfolio pays a rebate to the product house from which you’re buying the product and whether that rebate is passed on to you in the form of lower costs.

That covers your five big investment decisions. You probably have plenty more questions like ‘Satrix or unit trusts?’, ‘your own share trading account or someone else’s fund?’, ‘direct or listed property?’ We’ll cover these asset class-specific questions over the next few weeks.


Filed under: Money matters — admin @ 9:05 am
Posted: September 26, 2008 | Permalink| Comments (7)

Which investment product?

Foreigners are often surprised at the sophistication of the South African financial industry and the wide array of products available here. Don’t worry, I won’t cover them all in this post; only the three most popular ‘wrapper’ products available to individuals.

What is a wrapper? Your investment portfolio forms the heart of your investment. In other words, your choice between interest-yielding assets, shares, property and offshore assets drives the growth and volatility of your investment. The structure around your portfolio is the wrapper. Your choice of a wrapper will determine how your investment is regulated, when you may withdraw your money, how much tax you pay on income and capital gains, and many other issues that surround your investment.

1. Unit trusts

Unit trusts allow you to pool your money with many other investors, all investing in the same portfolio as you. The portfolio can consist of only interest-bearing assets, property, shares, offshore assets or any combination of asset classes. The assets are held by trustees on your behalf. You share in the growth and income of the portfolio in the same proportion as your number of units to the total number of units in the portfolio. You can access your money within 24 hours and add money to your investment at any time.

Unfortunately, you don’t get any tax-relief for your contributions and you become liable for capital gains tax when you withdraw your money (if there was any capital growth). You will also receive a certificate every year to show how much interest, rental or dividend income the portfolio earned and you have to declare this in your tax return.

Unit trusts form part of a bigger group of investment products called ‘collective investment schemes’ and they are regulated by the Association of Collective Investments. Their prices are published daily in most newspapers and you can view all the assets in the portfolio at least quarterly.

2. Retirement annuities

Technically, buying a retirement annuity actually means you become a member of a specific retirement fund. The fund’s trustees look after your interests. Sometimes the trustees buy an old-fashioned retirement policy on behalf of all members or an individual policy for each member. Often the policies contractually bind you to contribute premiums on a regular basis until a certain retirement age and penalise you if you stop contributing earlier. The life insurers issuing the policies usually appoint asset managers who choose the underlying investment portfolio.

Nowadays there’s a more modern, flexible and transparent version of the retirement annuity which allows you to choose your own investment portfolio (often a unit trust) and also allows you to contribute only when you can – without penalties. Still, neither version allows you to withdraw your money before you reach age 55. The age is determined by retirement fund legislation.

Why would anybody choose to be locked in for so long? Retirement annuities currently provide great tax benefits for the self-employed, as the government wants to encourage you to save for old age. As a tax-payer, you may therefore receive a tax rebate on your contributions, subject to certain limits. In addition, neither you nor the retirement fund pays any tax on the income earned by the investment portfolio. It’s only when you start drawing your pension, that you could pay tax on your retirement income exceeding the annual income threshold.

Unlike unit trusts and endowment policies, regulation requires the trustees to use their discretion when they decide who your dependents are and where the money should go after your death. As a result, they may overrule your beneficiary nomination.

3. Endowment policies

Like the old-fashioned retirement annuity policies, endowment policies have become unpopular because of the high penalties life insurers charge when you end the policy or stop your regular contributions before the contractual end date. Traditional endowment policies also do not allow you to select your own underlying investment portfolio and don’t always regularly disclose all assets in the portfolio they select on your behalf. Legislation effectively forces you to remain invested for five years. If you need the money earlier, you can withdraw it, but won’t receive more than your contributions plus 6% compound interest per year.

With all these restrictions, why do some people still prefer this wrapper? Unlike unit trusts, you don’t account for your investment income and capital growth in your tax return. In other words, you are not taxed directly; the fund that pools your contributions with that of other individual policyholders will pay the tax to SARS on your behalf. Currently the rate is 30% on all interest and rental income. Even though you are not taxed directly, the net effect is that you are left with only 70% of the interest and rental income earned by the portfolio. Individuals paying more than 30% tax on their annual interest and rental income may therefore benefit from the 30% tax rate of the endowment policy. Unfortunately, the policy doesn’t allow you to use your R19 000 annual interest exemption as an individual – interest earned by the portfolio is taxed from the first R1.

An endowment policy is therefore only an option if:

  • You are a high income tax payer
  • You expect substantial amounts of interest or rental income from your investment portfolio

Endowment policies have also evolved over the years. It is now possible to purchase policies that allow you to choose your own underlying investment portfolio, often from a wide range of unit trusts. Because the unit trust is wrapped within the policy, it follows the tax and other rules of an endowment policy, but offers the transparency of a unit trust investment.

Filed under: Money matters — admin @ 8:59 am